Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with a Synthetic Material Graft: Surgical Techniques and Effectiveness

Kon-Yong Kim, Chol-Nam Rim, Yon-Gyong An, Il-Chon Pak, Hyon Chol Choe, Myong Jin Jon

Abstract


The aim of our study is to analyses the clinical results of reconstruction using the synthetic material in patients who had presented with a symptomatic torn anterior cruciate ligament. Method: Between January 2014 and January 2018, we have researched 42 patients with isolated, symptomatic anterior cruciate ligament injury. Before the operation, all the patients should be taken physical examination and analysed; physical findings and functional scores were recorded and knee radiographs were identified. Rehabilitation therapy was applied for 6 months. Result: Forty-two patients were available for follow up which include physical examination, knee score, radiograph at the mean of twenty-four months. 36 (85%) of the patients had negative Lachman and pivot shift tests. The mean IKDC score bettered from 58 points preoperatively to 91 points at the time of follow-up (p < 0.01). The mean ADLS score bettered from 61 to 86 points (p < 0.01). Three patients (7%) had a positive pivot shift test but had no history of additional trauma to the knee. Three patients (7%) had a traumatic rupture of the graft, occurring at a mean of 10.7 months postoperatively. There is no evidence of progressive degenerative change in follow-up radiographs compared with the appearance on the preoperative radiographs. Conclusions: Using synthetic material grafit, 85% of patients with anterior tibial subluxation could be recovered and the overall rate of failure was 15%. The functional knee scores were significantly increased at the time of follow-up.


Keywords


tendon reconstruction, anterior cruciate ligament, synthetic material graft

Full Text:

PDF

References


Meighan AA, Keating JF, Will E. Outcome after reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament in athletic patients. A comparison of early versus delayed surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2003; 85(4): 521-4.

Jansson KA, Linko E, Sandelin J, Harilainen A. A prospective randomized study of patellar versus hamstring tendon autografts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2003; 31(1): 12-8.

Levitt RL, Malinin T, Posada A, Michalow A Reconstruction of anterior cruciate ligaments with bone-patellar tendon-bone and Achilles tendon allografts. Clin Orthop. 1994; (303): 67-78.

Noronha JC. Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament with quadriceps tendon. Arthroscopy. 2002; 18: E37.

Noyes FR, Barber-Westin SD. Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament with human allograft. Comparison of early and later results. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996; 78(4): 524-37.

Nyland J, Caborn DN, Rothbauer J, Kocabey Y, Couch J. Two-year outcomes following ACL reconstruction with allograft tibialis anterior tendons: a retrospective study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2003; 11(4):212-8.

Feller JA, Webster KE, Gavin B. Early postoperative morbidity following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: patellar tendon versus hamstring graft. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2001; 9(5): 260-6.

Randy Mascarenhas, Patellar Tendon Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in the High-Demand Patient: Evaluation of Autograft Versus Allograft Reconstruction The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery, 2010 Sep; 26(9 Suppl): S58-66.

Kellgren JH, Lawrence JS. Radiological assessment of osteoarthrosis. Ann Rheum Dis 1957; 16(4): 494-502.

Riley J. Williams, III, Jon Hyman, Frank Petrigliano, Tamara Rozental and Thomas L. Wickiewicz, Hamstring Tendon Autograft Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with a Four-Strand. J Bone Joint Surg Am. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004 Feb; 86(2): 225-32.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 Research & Reviews: Journal of Surgery