Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Demand for AYUSH Healthcare in India: Multinomial Logit Estimation of the Utilisation of Indian System of Medicine

T. Lakshmanasamy

Abstract


Despite the widespread use of the allopathic system of medicines, the indigenous non-allopathic systems of medicine are widely practiced and used in India. The increasing healthcare costs of the modern corporate type of hospitals and the less expensiveness of local herbal medicines drive the use of Ayurveda, Yoga and Naturopathy, Unani, Siddha and Homeopathy (AYUSH) hospitals for the treatments of chronic diseases, acute illness episodes, maternity health care and catastrophic health expenditure. Within the AYUSH healthcare system, there are state-wise differentials in the use of AYUSH systems of medicine. The present paper analyses the use of the AYUSH healthcare system in India using the 68th round (2011–2012) of National Sample Survey Organisation data for the four southern states of India—Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka, Kerala and Tamil Nadu—applying the multinomial logit method to estimate the number of visits to the AYUSH hospitals by household members. The estimated results show that the relative probability of choosing the AYUSH treatment and the number of visits to AYUSH hospitals is influenced significantly by the cost of medical expenditure, wealth/income/landholding, household size and composition and region. The occupation, household headship and community of the household have no significant effect on the use of AYUSH hospital healthcare in southern India. 


Keywords


healthcare, Indian system of medicine, Ayurveda, Yoga and Naturopathy, Unani, Siddha and Homoeopathy (AYUSH) treatment, hospitals visits, medical expenditure, multinomial logit (MNL) estimation

Full Text:

PDF

References


World Health Organisation. General guidelines for methodologies on research and evaluation of traditional medicine. Geneva: WHO; 2000.

Deb Roy S. Prospects, problems and approaches to alternative system of medicine: A review. Int J Ayurvedic Herb Med. 2012; 2(1): 192–197p.

National Sample Survey Organisation. Morbidity and Utilisation of Medical Services 42nd Round NSS (1986-87). New Delhi, India: NSSO, Department of Statistics, Ministry of Planning, Government of India; 1992.

Chandrasekhara S, Anilkumar T, Jamuna S. Complementary and alternative drug therapy in Arthritis. J Assoc Physicians India. 2002; 50(2): 225–227p.

Rudra S, Kalra A, Kumar A, Joe W. Utilisation of alternative systems of medicine as health care services in India: Evidence on AYUSH care from NSS 2014. PLos. 2017; 12(5): e0176916. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0176916.

Manasi S, Raju KV, Hemalatha BR, Poornima S, Rashmi KP. Alternative medicine approaches as healthcare intervention: A case study of AYUSH programme in peri urban locales. Working paper 355. Bangaluru, India: Institute for Social and Economic Change; 2016.

Mukherjee S, Haddad S, Narayana D. Patient’s choice for non-allopathic providers for acute illness: Evidence from a rural setting in Kerala. Ind J Human Develop. 2012; 6(2): 225–244p.

Priya R. The status and role of AYUSH and local health traditions in public health. The Newsletter of the International Institute of Asian Studies. 2013; 65: 24–25p.

Sujatha V. The patient as a knower: Principle and practice in siddha medicine. Econ Polit Wkly. 2009; 44(16): 76–83p.

Lakshmi JK, Nambiar D, Narayan V, Sathyanarayana TN, Porter J, Sheikh K. Cultural consonance, constructions of science and co-existence: A review of the integration of traditional, complementary and alternative medicine in low- and middle-income countries. Health Policy Plan. 2015; 30: 1067–1077p.

Oyebode O, Kandala NB, Chilton PJ, Lilford RJ. Use of traditional medicine in middle-income countries: A WHO-SAGE study. Health Policy and Planning. 2016; 31(8): 984–991p.

Singh P, Yadav RJ, Pandey A. Utilization of indigenous systems of medicine & homoeopathy in India. Indian J Med Res. 2005; 122: 137–142p.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.