Importance of Clinical Evaluation in Nasopalatine Duct Cyst: A Case Report
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37591/rrjod.v7i1.1071Abstract
Present case report shows the importance of proper history taking, clinical evaluation such as swelling in the midline of the anterior palate, midline diastema and radiographical diagnostic aid like cone beam computed tomography which revealed a large well circumscribed oval shaped or heart shaped periapical radiolucency, resorption of antero-medial cortex of naso-palatine canal with an involvement of neighboring anatomical structures like upper impacted incisors helps in proper diagnosis of non-odontogenic cystic pathology like nasopalatine duct cyst and also optimizes the decision making for appropriate treatment plan for it.
Keywords: Nasopalatine duct cyst, surgical enucleation, cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT), buccal mucoperiosteal flap
Cite this Article
D.S. Yadav, S. Chandan, R. Gupta et al. Importance of Clinical Evaluation in Nasopalatine Duct Cyst-A Case Report. Research and Reviews: Journal of Dentistry. 2016; 7(1): 7–11p.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Declaration and Copyright Transfer Form
(to be completed by authors)
I/ We, the undersigned author(s) of the submitted manuscript, hereby declare, that the above manuscript which is submitted for publication in the STM Journals(s), is not published already in part or whole (except in the form of abstract) in any journal or magazine for private or public circulation, and, is not under consideration of publication elsewhere.
- I/We will not withdraw the manuscript after 1 week of submission as I have read the Author Guidelines and will adhere to the guidelines.
- I/We Author(s ) have niether given nor will give this manuscript elsewhere for publishing after submitting in STM Journal(s).
- I/ We have read the original version of the manuscript and am/ are responsible for the thought contents embodied in it. The work dealt in the manuscript is my/ our own, and my/ our individual contribution to this work is significant enough to qualify for authorship.
- I/We also agree to the authorship of the article in the following order:
Author’s name
1. ________________
2. ________________
3. ________________
4. ________________
| We Author(s) tick this box and would request you to consider it as our signature as we agree to the terms of this Copyright Notice, which will apply to this submission if and when it is published by this journal. |