Knowledge and awareness regarding primary teeth and their importance amongst postgraduate students of specialty other than pediatric dentistry in and around Vadodara city, India – A questionnaire survey

Authors

  • Neelam Hasmukhbhai Joshi Reader, Department of Pedodontics, Ahmedabad Dental College & Hospital.
  • Dr. Raina Joshi
  • Dr. Sonali Kapoor

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37591/rrjod.v13i3.3041

Abstract

Abstract

Primary teeth play an inevitable role in eating, phonetics, esthetics and also act as a space

maintainer for permanent teeth. Therefore, their retention with a timely checkup and proper intervention due to caries is required till eruption of permanent teeth. This is to prevent the early tooth loss due to caries which is more frequent scenario. This is due to unawareness, ignorance and negligence amongst parents about children’s oral hygiene resulting in delay for early caries detection and required dental treatment. Moreover, there are also differences in approach to treating a pulpally involved primary tooth among general dentist, other specialist dentist as compared to a Pedodontist.

Aim- To determine the knowledge, awareness and perception of post graduate students of other specialties regarding primary teeth and their importance in children

Method- A cross-sectional study was conducted to determine the knowledge, awareness and perception of post graduate students of other specialties regarding primary teeth and their importance. It consisted of a structured questionnaire of 15 multiple choice questions in English language. It was distributed to post graduate students of different specialities except pediatrics and preventive dentistry of three different colleges after obtaining their consent. Content

validation of the questionnaire was done using test-retest method. The data collected was

entered in the Master chart using Microsoft excel 2007. Statistical analysis was performed through SPSS software and Pearson’s Chi square test was used for the same.

Results- Out of 139 survey respondents, the majority (82.01%) were aware of the importance of

primary teeth and gave an opinion for saving infected primary teeth by doing pulp therapy.

But, most of the respondents opted for behavioural management followed by high time consumption and their lack of knowledge in pediatric dentistry as the most common reasons for not opting for endodontic treatment in primary molars. Also, 96 (69.06%) respondents were aware about the concept of a dental home.

Conclusion: Awareness of proper treatment modalities for primary teeth among different specialities will aid in proper treatment planning and protocol and enhance retention of primary teeth until the time of eruption of permanent teeth.

References

Setty JV, Srinivasan I. Knowledge andAwareness of Primary Teeth and Their Importance among Parents in Bengaluru City, India. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2016;9(1):56-61

Togoo R, Nasim V, Zakirulla M, Yaseen S. Knowledge and practice of pulp therapy in deciduous teeth among general dental practitioners in Saudi Arabia. Ann Med Health Sci Res 2012;2:119-23.

Fuks AB. Pulp therapy of the primary dentition. In: Pinkham JR, Casamassimo PS, McTigue DJ, Fields HW, Nowak AJ, editors. Pediatric Dentistry: Infancy through Adolscence. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier Saunders Inc.; 2010. p. 577-8

Ismail AI, Hashim Nainar SM. Children’s first dental visit: attitudes and practices of US pediatricians and family physicians. Pediatr Dent. 2003;25(5):425-30.

US Dept. of Health and Human Services. Oral health in America: a report of the surgeon general. Rockville, MD: US Dept of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Dental and Craniofacial Research, National Institutes of Health; 2000.

Vargas CM, Crall JJ, Schneider DA. Sociodemographic distribution of pediatric dental caries: NHANES III, 1988-1994. J Am Dent Assoc.1998;129:1229-38.

Patil PD, Katge AF, Rusawat DB. Knowledge and attitude of pediatric dentists, general dentists, postgraduates of pediatric dentistry, and dentists of other specialties toward the endodontic treatment of primary teeth. J Orofac Sci 2016;8:96-10.

Acharya S. Knowledge and attitude of general and specialist dentist in pediatric dentistry: A pilot study in Odisha, India. Indian J DentRes 2019;30:170-4.

McKnight‑Hanes C, Myers DR, Dushku JC, Barenie JT. A comparison of general dentists’ and pediatric dentists’ treatment recommendations for primary teeth. Pediatr Dent 1991;13:344‑8.

Halawany HS, Al‑Fadda SA, Al‑Saeed BH, Al‑Homaied MA. The attitude of private dental practitioners towards treatment and management of children in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. J Pak Dent Assoc 2011;20:245‑9.

AAPD. Guideline on pulp therapy for primary and immature permanent teeth. Pediatr Dent 2012;34:222‑9.

Rodd HD, Waterhouse PJ, Fuks AB, Fayle SA, Moffat MA; British Society of Paediatric Dentistry. Pulp therapy for primary molars. Int J Paediatr Dent 2006;16 Suppl 1:15‑23.

Trairatvorakul C, Chunlasikaiwan S. Success of pulpectomy with zinc oxide‑eugenol vs calcium hydroxide/iodoform paste in primary molars: A clinical study. Pediatr Dent 2008;30:303‑8

Holan G, Fuks AB, Ketlz N. Success rate of formocresol pulpotomy in primary molars restored with Stainless Steel vs Amalgam. Pediatr Dent 2002;24:212‑6.

Hammersmith KJ, Siegal MD, et al. Ohio dentists’ awareness and incorporation of the dental home concept. J Am Dent Assoc 2013 Jun 1;144(6):645–653. DOI: 10.14219/jada.archive.2013.0176

Downloads

Published

2023-04-05

Issue

Vol. 13 No. 3 (2022)

Section

Research Article

License

Declaration and Copyright Transfer Form

(to be completed by authors)

I/ We, the undersigned author(s) of the submitted manuscript, hereby declare, that the above manuscript which is submitted for publication in the STM Journals(s), is not published already in part or whole (except in the form of abstract) in any journal or magazine for private or public circulation, and, is not under consideration of publication elsewhere.

  • I/We will not withdraw the manuscript after 1 week of submission as I have read the Author Guidelines and will adhere to the guidelines.
  • I/We Author(s ) have niether given nor will give this manuscript elsewhere for publishing after submitting in STM Journal(s).
  • I/ We have read the original version of the manuscript and am/ are responsible for the thought contents embodied in it. The work dealt in the manuscript is my/ our own, and my/ our individual contribution to this work is significant enough to qualify for authorship.
  •  I/We also agree to the authorship of the article in the following order:

Author’s name                                    

 

1. ________________

2. ________________

3. ________________

4. ________________

 

We  Author(s) tick this box and would request you to consider it as our signature as we agree to the terms of this Copyright Notice, which will apply to this submission if and when it is published by this journal.