Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Effect of Retraction of Anterior Teeth on Skeletal and Soft Tissue Parameters: A Cephalometric Study

Rohit Kulshrestha

Abstract


Aim and Objectives: The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the magnitude of alteration in the position of skeletal and soft tissue points A and B, points A (sA) and B (sB) with retraction of anterior teeth on lateral Cephalogram. Material And Method: Patients with a bimaxillary protrusion, treated with first premolar extractions followed by using a pre-adjusted appliance with maximum anchorage were included in the study. After the removal of the fixed appliance, radiographs were taken to evaluate the change in parameters between two-time intervals using the ‘t-test’. Result: Hard and soft tissue point A showed a mean change of (AFHP) 0.89±2.56 mm (p=.007) and SSFHP 1.59±2.78 mm (p=0.005). The change in point 'B’ hard and soft tissue BFHP is 1.34±3.84 mm (p=.007) and SIFHP is 1.54±4.40 mm (p=.007). However, the change was significant statistically only for SSFHP (p=0.005). For soft tissue, linear measurements of upper and lower lips changes in LSFH and LIFH, the mean change was 3.59±3.65 mm (p=0.000), and 4.04±4.47 mm (p=0.007) respectively. Conclusion: No statistical difference was observed at the skeletal point ‘A’ and point ‘B’ yet, the difference was relevant clinically. The spatial position of soft and hard tissue point ‘B’ and downwards and backward mandibular rotation leads to the changes seen. The reliability of mean cephalometric standards alone, for the dental movement along with the skeletal correction, mandibular rotation, and perioral soft tissue interactions is still a matter of concern.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bills DA, Handelman CS, BeGole EA. Bimaxillary protrusion: traits and orthodontic correction. Angle Orthod. 2005; 75(3): 333–9.

Diels RM, Kalra V, DeLoach N, Powers M, Nelson SS. Changes in soft tissue profile of African- Americans following extraction treatment. Angle Orthod. 1995; 65(4): 285–92.

Erverdi N. A cephalometric study of changes in point A under the influence of upper incisor inclinations. J Nihon Univ Sch Dent. 1991; 33(3): 160–5.

Cangialosi TJ, Meistrell ME Jr. A cephalometric evaluation of hard and soft tissue changes during the third stage Begg treatment. Am J Orthod. 1982; 81(2): 124–9.

Goldin B. Labial root torque: effect on the maxilla and incisor root apex. Am J Orthod. 1989; 95(3): 208–19.

Holdaway RA. A soft-tissue cephalometric analysis and its use in orthodontic treatment planning. Am J Orthod. 1983; 84(1): 1–28.

Ricketts RM. Foundation for Cephalometric Communication. Am J Orthod. 1960; 46(5): 330–57.

Burstone CJ. Lip posture and its significance in treatment planning Am J Orthod. 1987; 53(4): 262–84.

Subtelny JD. A longitudinal study of soft tissue facial structure and their profile characteristic defined in relation to the underlying skeletal structure. Am J Orthod. 1959; 45(7): 481–507.

Hodges A, Rossouw PE, Campbell PM, Boley JC, Alexander RA, Buschang PH. Prediction of lip response to four first premolar extractions in white female adolescents and adults. Angle Orthod. 2009; 79(3): 413–21.

Arumugam E, Duraisamy S, Ravi k, Krishnaraj R. Prediction of soft tissue profile changes following orthodontic retraction of incisors in South Indian females. SRM Univ J Dent Sci. 2012; 3(1): 10–14.

Sharma JN. Skeletal and soft tissue points A and B change following orthodontic treatment of Nepalese Class I bimaxillary protrusive patients. Angle Orthod. 2010; 80(1): 91–6.

Rains MD, Nanda R. Soft tissue changes associated with maxillary incisor retraction. Am J Orthod. 1982; 81(6): 481–8.

Talass MF, Talass L, Baker RC. Soft tissue profile changes resulting from retraction of maxillary incisors. Am J Orthod. 1987; 91(5): 385–94. 15. LaMastra Salvator J. Relationships between changes in skeletal and integumental points A and B following orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod. 1981; 79(4): 416–23.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.37591/rrjod.v13i3.3088

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 Research & Reviews: A Journal of Dentistry