Open Access
Subscription or Fee Access
Comparison of the Accuracy of the Computer-guided Surgery with Different Templates
Abstract
The advent of computed tomography and the development of new pre-surgical programming software has completely revolutionized the surgical approach in dentistry. Through virtual study, it is possible to program the surgery with the aim of obtaining a surgical guide that allows for the insertion of an implant in the ideal position. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the different accuracies obtained using different surgical guides. 16 implants were inserted in four patients. The implants were divided into two groups: the first consisting of 11 implants placed with mucosal support surgical guides, and the second group consisting of five implants placed with dental support surgical guides. The CBCT standard superimposition protocol was used to evaluate accuracy. The result obtained shows how dental support guides presented a lower average deviation in both position and angle. However, values are not such as to preclude the successful outcome of the intervention even after using mucosal support guides. Future randomized controlled studies are necessary to confirm the results of this work and to evaluate possible variables that may affect the accuracy of this technique
Keywords
References
Dudley J. Implants for the ageing population. Aust Dent J. 2015; 60(Suppl 1): 28–43.
A systematic review of implant outcomes in treated periodontitis patients. Clin Oral Implant Res. 2016; 27(7): 787–844.
Fuentealba R, Jofré J. Esthetic failure in implant dentistry. Den Clin North Am. 2015; 59(1): 227–246.
Hämmerle C, Stone P, Jung R, Kapos T, Brodala N. Consensus statements and recommended clinical procedures regarding computer-assisted implant dentistry. Int J Oral Maxillofacial Implants. 2009; 24: 126–30.
Colombo M, Mancano C, Mijiritsky E, Krebs M, Hauschild U, Fortin T. Clinical applications and effectiveness of guided implant surgery: a critical review based on randomized controlled trials. BMC Oral Health. 2017; 17(1): 150.
Zhou W, Liu Z, Song L, Kuo CL, Shafer DM. Clinical Factors Affecting the Accuracy of Guided Implant Surgery-A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2018 Mar; 18(1): 28–40.
Raico Gallardo YN, da Silva-Olivio IRT, Mukai E, Morimoto S, Sesma N, Cordaro L. Accuracy comparison of guided surgery for dental implants according to the tissue of support: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017 May; 28(5): 602–612.
Turbush S, Turkyilmaz I. Accuracy of three different types of stereolithographic surgical guide in implant placement: an in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent. 2012 Sep; 108(3): 181–188.
Arisan V, Karabuda CZ, Ozdemir T. Implant surgery using bone- and mucosa-supported stereolithographic guides in totally edentulous jaws: surgical and post-operative outcomes of computer-aided vs. standard techniques. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010 Sep; 21(9): 980–8.
Accuracy of implant placement based on pre-surgical planning of three-dimensional cone-beam images: a pilot study. J Clin Periodontol. 2007; 34(9): 816–821.
Vasak C, Watzak G, Gahleitner A, Strbac G, Schemper M, Zechner W. Computed tomography-based evaluation of template (NobelGuide™)- guided implant positions: a prospective radiological study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011 Oct; 22(10): 1157–1163.
Accuracy of positioning of implants inserted using a mucosa-supported stereolitho-graphic surgical guide in the edentulous maxilla and mandible. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014; 29(5): 1071–8.
Marlière D, Demètrio M, Picinini L, Oliveira R, Netto H. Accuracy of computer-guided surgery for dental implant placement in fully edentulous patients: A systematic review. Eur J Dent. 2018 Jan-Mar; 12(1): 153–160.
Ozan O, Turkyilmaz I, Ersoy AE, McGlumphy EA, Rosenstiel SF. Clinical accuracy of 3 different types of computed tomography-derived stereolithographic surgical guides in implant placement.
Flanagan D. Flapless Dental Implant Placement. J Oral Implantol. 2007; 33(2): 75–83.
Rousseau P. Flapless and Traditional Dental Implant Surgery: An Open, Retrospective Comparative Study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010 Sep; 68(9): 2299–306.
Verhamme LM, Meijer GJ, Boumans T, de Haan AF, Bergé SJ, Maal TJ. A clinically relevant accuracy study of computer-planned implant placement in the edentulous maxilla using mucosa-supported surgical templates.
Tahmaseb A, Wu V, Wismeijer D, Coucke W, Evans C. The accuracy of static computer-aided implant surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018 Oct; 29(Suppl 16): 416–435.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2023 Research & Reviews: A Journal of Dentistry