Effect of total-etch and self-etch adhesives on postoperative sensitivity in occlusal cavities restored with composite resin – An Invivo Study
Abstract
Aims and objectives: Comparison of POS with composite restorations in class I cavities placed using different adhesive systems.
Methodology: This invivo study was conducted in Sri Siddhartha dental college, A total of 90 participants with class I cavities with a depth of 2-3 mm in posterior teeth were taken. The patients were selected based on consecutive sampling of 30 each. Group I- Prime and Bond NT - (Dentsply) – Total-Etch, Group II- Xeno III (Dentsply) – Two component Self-Etch and Group III-Xeno V (Dentsply) – Single component Self-Etch. Sensitivity was evaluated just before cavity preparation using modified visual analog scale (VAS) and response time to cold stimulus (ice) and air spray. Similarly, POS were assessed immediately after restoration, at seven days and thirty days intervals.
Results: Data was analysed by Wilcoxon’s signed rank test, Kruskal Wallis Anova, Mann – Whitney test and Post – hoc Tukey’s test by using SPSS version 16.
Conclusion: POS was present with total etch adhesives were as self-etch adhesives showed least sensitivity
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Luiz Narciso Baratieri, Andre V. Four-Year clinical evaluation of posterior resin- based composite restorations placed using the total-etch technique. J Eesthet Restor Dent 2001; 13(1):50–7.
Christensen G. Preventing sensitivity in class II composite resin restorations J Am Dent Assc 1998; 129:1469-70.
Gary S. Berkowitz, Allan J. Horowitz , Fredrick A.Curro, Ronald G.Craig , Jonathan A. Ship, Donald A.Vena, Van P. Thompson. Postoperative sensitivity in class I Resin-based Composite Restorations in General Practice: Interim Results. Compd Contd Educ Dent 2009; 30:356-63.
David Eick J, Fenn H. Welch. Polymerization shrinkage of posterior composite resins and its possible influence on postoperative sensitivity. Quintessence Int 1986; 17:103-11.
Suguki M, Jordan RE, Bohsman, L. Posterior composite resin restoration clinical considerations. InG, Vanherle and D. C. Smith St. Paul: 3M Co, 1985 455-57.
Luana Dutra de Carvalho, Renata Gondo Machado. Nano filled composite restorations with different adhesives strategies: clinical cases. Case reports in dentistry 2012; 1-6.
Meerbeek B V, Van Landuyt K L. State of the art of self-etch adhesives. Dent Mater 2011; 11:24–34.
Swift Jr EJ. Dentin/enamel adhesives: review of the literature. Pediatr Dent 2002; 24:456.
B V Meerbeek, J De Munck, Y Yoshida. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: current status and future challenges. Oper Dent 2003; 28(3):215-235.
Hayashi M, Wilson NHF. Failure risk of posterior composites with postoperative sensitivity. Oper dent 2003; 28:681-8.
St Georges A, Wilder AD Jr, Perdigão J, Swift E Jr. Microleakage of class V composites using different placement and curing techniques: An in vitro study. Am J Dent 2002; 15:244–7.
Lai J.H, Johnson, A.E. Measuring polymerization shrinkage of photoactivated restorative materials by a water filled dilatometer. Dent Mater 1993; 9(2): 139-143.
Mirza Mubashir Baig, Mohammed Mustafa. Microleakage evaluation in restorations using different resin composite insertion techniques and liners in preparations with high c-factor – An in vitro study. King Saud University Journal of Dental Sciences 2013; 4:57–64.
Brannstorm M. The hydrodynamic theory of dentinal pain; sensation in preparations, caries and the dentinal crack syndrome. J Endod 1986; 12(10) 453-57.
Mottola CA. Measurement strategies: the visual analogue scale. Decubitus 1993; 6:56-8.
Langley GB, Sheppeard H. The visual analogue scale: its use in pain measurement. Rheum Int 1985; 5:145-8.
Pashley DH, Carvalho RM. Dentine permeability and dentine adhesion. Journal of Dentistry 1997; 25:355-72.
Tay F, Gwinnett J, Wei S. Micro morphological spectrum from over drying to over wetting acid-conditioned dentin in water-free acetone-based, single-bottle primer/adhesives. Dent Mater 1996; 12:236–244.
Tay F, Gwinnett A,Wei S. The over wet phenomenon: an optical, micro morphological study of surface moisture in the acid-conditioned, resin-dentin interface. Am J Dent 1996; 9:43–48.
Toledano M, Osorio R, Leonardi G de , Rosales-Leal J, Ceballos L, Cabrerizo-Vilchez M. Influence of self-etching primer on the resin adhesion to enamel and dentin. Am J Dent 2001; 14:205–210.
Albers HF. Tooth coloured restoratives, principles and techniques. 9th ed. BC Decker; 2002; 146-7.
Reis AF, Oliveria MT, Giamini M, De Goes MF, Rueggerberg FA. The effect of organic solvents on one-bottle adhesives bond strength to enamel and dentin. Oper Dent 2003; 28:700-6.
Opdam NJ, Roeters FJ, Feilzer AJ, Verdonschot EH. Marginal integrity and postoperative sensitivity in Class 2 resin composite restorations in vivo. J Dent 1998; 26:555-562.
Opdam NJ, Feilzer AJ, Roeters JJ, Smale I. Class I occlusal composite resin restorations: in vivo post-operative sensitivity, wall adaptation, and microleakage. Am J Dent 1998; 11:229-34.
Mohamed A, Ibrahim H, Ragab W, Badrawy. Influence of resin-tags on shear-bond strength of butanol-based adhesives. Life Sci J 2007; 4:105-13.
Braga RR, Ferracane JR. Contraction stress related to degree of conversion and reaction kinetics. J Dent Res 2002; 81: 114–118.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2023 Research & Reviews: Journal of Medical Science and Technology
This Journal archive has been shifted to: https://journals.stmjournals.com/archive/rrjomst/