Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

A Study to Assess the Effectiveness of Benson’s Relaxation Therapy on Blood Pressure and Stress Among Mothers with Gestational Hypertension

Harpreet Kaur, Karuna Sharma

Abstract


The quasi-experimental study, to know the effectiveness of Benson’s relaxation therapy on blood pressure and stress among mothers with gestational hypertension, was done with 20 gestational hypertension mothers, 10 in the experimental and 10 in the control group. The experimental group was instructed on Benson's relaxation technique. They were asked to perform it thrice a day for 20 minutes daily for a period of 6 days. On the seventh day, blood pressure and stress levels were measured. According to the study's findings, the pre-test systolic and diastolic blood pressure of every participant in both the experimental group and the control group ranged from 140 to 159 mm Hg and 90 to 99 mm Hg, respectively. About 50% of the experimental group's systolic blood pressure dropped below 130 mm Hg after receiving Benson relaxation therapy, while 100% of the control group's systolic blood pressure ranged from 140 to 159 mm Hg and its diastolic blood pressure ranged from 90 to 99 mm Hg. Mean post-test systolic blood pressure (MD=20, t=6.708, p0.05) and diastolic blood pressure (MD=8.2, t=4.755, p0.05) both decreased significantly. The experimental group's mean post-test systolic blood pressure score (124.0) was lower than the control group's (124.0). (145.60). The experimental group's mean post-test diastolic blood pressure score (83.0) was lower than the control group's (88.20). Prior to the test, the majority of the women—50% in the experimental group and 50% in the control group—had mild to moderate levels of stress. After Benson relaxation therapy, 60% of the experimental group had mild levels of stress, 40% were normal, and 50% in the control group had moderate levels of stress. The experimental group's mean post-test stress level significantly decreased (MD=14.3, t=5.870, p 0.05).


Full Text:

PDF

References


Gant NF, Worley RJ, Everett RB, MacDonald PC. Control of vascular responsiveness during human pregnancy. Kidney international. 1980 Aug 1; 18(2): 253–8.

Shirish ND, Muralidhar VP, Pralhad K, Sudip C. Holland and Brews Manual of Obstetrics. Contemporary Obstetric Practice, 4th edition. New Delhi: Reed Elsevier India; 2015. p. 530–70.

Bobak MI, Jensen MD, Zalar MK. Maternity and Gynecologic Care: The Nurse and the Family. Vol. 1. Toronto: Mosby Publications; 1989. p. 1190–203.

Fraser DM, Cooper MA. Myles’ Textbook for Midwives. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 2009. p. 55–65.

Pilliteri A. Maternal and Child Health Nursing. Philadelphia: J B Lippincott Publishers Company; 1998. p. 122–38.

Cunningham FG, Leveno KJ, Bloom SL, Dashe JS, Hoffman BL, Casey BM et al. Obstetrícia de Williams. Brasil: McGraw-Hill; 2021.

Abel KM, Heuvelman HP, Jörgensen L, Magnusson C, Wicks S, Susser E et al. Severe bereavement stress during the prenatal and childhood periods and risk of psychosis in later life: population based cohort study. BMJ. 2014 Jan 21;348:f7679. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f7679.

Bastani F, Hidarnia A, Montgomery KS, Aguilar-Vafaei ME, Kazemnejad A. Does relaxation education in anxious primigravid Iranian women influence adverse pregnancy outcomes? a randomized controlled trial. J Perinat Neonatal Nurs. 2006 Apr 1;20(2):138–46. doi: 10.1097/00005237–200604000–00007.

Saifullah S, Shoaib M, Sohail Tareen M, Sikander Baloch N. Incidence of Pregnancy Induced Hypertensive Women and its Associated Factors. PJMHS. 2021;15(12):3307–9. doi: 10.53350/pjmhs2115123307.

Scott G, Gillon TE, Pels A, von Dadelszen P, Magee LA. Guidelines-similarities and dissimilarities: a systematic review of international clinical practice guidelines for pregnancy hypertension. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Feb 1;226(2S):S1222–36. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.08.018.

Dolea C, Abou Zahr C. Global Burden of Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy in the Year 2000. Global Burden of Disease 2000. Evidence and Information for Policy (EIP). [working paper]. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2003.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.37591/rrjon.v12i3.3079

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Research & Reviews: Journal of Neuroscience