Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Principles of Interpolating Prognostication in Oncology

Michael Shoikhedbrod

Abstract


Abstract
The precise prediction in oncology plays a critical role in prevention, treatment, assessment of the effectiveness of methods of treatment and treatment outcomes for cancer patients. Some medical researches claim that statistical processing (factor analysis) permits to precisely individualize the prognosis, which determines the possibility of an individual approach to monitoring and postoperative treatment of patients. However, factor analysis permits only creating a matrix of factors that can significantly describe the study area, but it makes no sense to talk about factor prognostication, and even more about an error-free individualized prognosis, which determines the possibility of an individual approach to monitoring and postoperative treatment of patients. Even mathematical calculation of the existing pairwise correlation between all the studied symptoms (correlation matrix) and, in some cases, determination (predicting) with a certain accuracy of the relationship (regression) between a pair of studied symptoms or an investigated symptom with several symptoms using a polynomial regression program, or multiple linear regression and stepwise multiple regression programs do not permit to make the precise prognosis. The most precise prognostication method in computational mathematics today is the interpolating method. In the paper, along with the description of existing interpolating methods, the two developed principles of interpolating prognostication in oncology are presented: the minimizing of the difference (error) between the known and calculated by different polynomial interpolating methods numerical values of the investigated symptom; the selection as the values of the investigated symptom the maximal values of statistical frequencies of the observed patients in the given intervals of conducting study. These principles led to the development of an algorithm and then a system of computer programs for optimal interpolating prognostication of the investigated symptoms in oncology. Application of the developed system in clinical conditions permitted to identify a splash ("hump") of patients with metastases after surgery and to determine the effect of using of various methods of preventive treatment after surgery on the increase of the time before the appearance of metastases among the patients, i.e. to determine the effectiveness of the applied treatments.

 

Keywords: Computational mathematics, interpolation, optimal interpolating prognostication, the effectiveness of the applied treatments of malignant new formations, precise prognosis of time of metastases appearance after surgery

Cite this Article

M. Shoikhedbrod. Principles of Interpolating Prognostication in Oncology. Research & Reviews: Journal of Oncology and Hematology. 2020; 9(2): 39–51p


Full Text:

PDF

References


Leskova N. (2013) As easy as, Itogy, 2013, 869(5).

Lactionov K.K. The squamous cells lung cancer (value of the clinical-morphological and

molecular-genetic characteristics of tumor in the prognostication of the results of surgical

treatment), Dissertations. Dr. Med. Sciences, Moscow, 2007.

Brezinski C. The Generalization of Newton’s Interpolation Formula Due to Muhlbach and

Andoyer, Electronic Transactions on Numerical Analysis 1994, 2, 130-137.

Das Biswajit, Chakrabarty Dhritikesh. Newton’s forward interpolation: representation of numerical

data by a polynomial curve, International Journal of Statistics and Applied Mathematics, 2016,

(2), 36-41.

Camargo André Pierro. On the numerical stability of Newton’s formula for Lagrange interpolation,

Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 2020, 365, 112369.

Byrne Graeme J, Mills T.M., Smith Simon J. On Lagrange interpolation with equidistant nodes,

Bulletin of the Australian Mathematical Society,1990, 42 (1), 81-89.

Lehmann Thomas Martin, Gonner Claudia, Spitzer Klaus. Addendum: B-spline interpolation in

medical image processing, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 2001, 20 (7), 660-665.

McKinley Sky, Levine Megan. Cubic spline interpolation, College of the Redwoods, 45 (1),

-1060.

Akhmedov B.P., Shoikhedbrod S.P., Shoikhedbrod M.P., Chernovsky A.K Medical and

mathematical modeling of generalization processes for malignant neoplasm’s. Metastatic

spreading of malignant tumors new approaches. Preprints of the Reports at the 1ts All-Union

Symposium, Kiev, 1991

Shoikhedbrod M.P. Computer modeling and the new technologies in oncology. Lambert

Academic publishing. Toronto, 2017

Shoikhedbrod M.P. Computer modeling in physics and medicine, Lambert Academic publishing.

Toronto, 2018

System/360 Scientific Subroutine Package (360A-CM-03X) Version III, Programmer's Manual,

Fourth Edition, IBM, Technical, Publications Department, N. Y., 1974.

Enderling H., Chaplain M.A.J Mathematical Modeling of Tumor Growth and Treatment.

Current Pharmaceutical Design,2014, 20, 00

Akhmedov B.P., Akhmedova Sh.B The results of the application of special mathematical

methods of study on the computer in the study of prognostication and modeling of the

processes of the generalization of malignant new formations. Tashkent, 2002


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 Research & Reviews: Journal of Oncology and Hematology