Comparison between two severity classificaitons in patients with acute cholecystitis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37591/rrjos.v12i2.3208Keywords:
Acute cholecystitis, severity classificationAbstract
Background and objective: Assessment severity helps clinicians to guide appropriate treatment and minimumize adverse outcome. The objective of our study was to comparison between TG13 severity system and EGS grade system for predicting clinical outcomes in acute cholecystitis. Patients and method: This is a retrospective single-center study which enrolled patients who were admitted to pyongsong medical university hospital between February 2020 and October 2021. Tokyo 2013(TG 13) severity classification and emergency general surgery(EGS) severity systems were validated. Clinical outcomes were mortality, postoperative complication, need for emergency surgery and hospital stay. Predictive accuracies were evaluated using area under the ROC curve (AUC).
Results: A total of 164 patients were included in the analysis(mean age of 57.4 years; 52.4% males). On the basis of EGS grade, 132 patients(80.5%), 22 patients(13.5%), 2 patients(1.2%), 4 patients(2.4%) and 4 patients(2.4%) were determined to have Ⅰ, Ⅱ, Ⅲ, Ⅳ and Ⅴ. Using TG13 grade, 113 patients(68.9%) were categorized as mild, 46 patients(28.0%) as moderate, and 5 patients(3.1%) as severe. In general, higher grades of severity were signifi cantly associated with worse clinical outcomes for all classification systems and this was more precise in TG 13 severity system.
EGS severity classification was more superior to TG 13 grade system for predicting mortality(AUC 0.866 vs. 0.812, P < 0.001), postoperative complication(AUC 0.848 vs. 0.799, P < 0.001) and need for surgery(AUC 0.798 vs. 0.734, P < 0.001). Conclusion: EGS severity classification was more superior to TG 13 grade system for predicting clinical outcomes.
References
Portincasa P, Moschetta A, Palasciano G. Cholesterol gallstone disease, Lancet, 2006, 15(368), 230~239.
Shaffer EA. Epidemiology and risk factors for gallstone disease: has the paradigm changed in the 21st century? Curr Gastroenterol Rep, 2005, 7, 132~140.
Hirota M, Takada T, Kawarada Y, et al. Diagnostic criteria and severity assessment of acute cholecystitis: Tokyo Guidelines. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2007;14:78-82.
Kimura Y, Takada T, Kawarada Y, et al. Definitions, pathophysiology, and epidemiology of acute cholangitis and cholecystitis: Tokyo Guidelines. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2007;14:15-26.
Yokoe M et al. TG13 diagnostic criteria and severity grading of acute cholecystitis (with videos), J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci , 2013, 20, 35~46.
Yokoe M, et al. New diagnostic criteria and severity assessment of acute cholecystitis in revised Tokyo guidelines, J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci, 2012, 19, 578~585.
Crandall ML, Agarwal S, Muskat P, et al. Application of a uniform anatomic grading system to measure disease severity in eight emergency general surgical illnesses. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2014;77:705-8.
Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation, J Chronic Dis, 1987, 40, 373~383.
Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, et al. The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg 2009;250:187-96.
De Long ER, De Long DM. Comparing the area under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a non parametric approach. Biometrics 1988; 44: 837–45.
Matthew H et al. Validation of the AAST EGS acute cholecystitis grade and comparison with the Tokyo guidelines, Surgery, 2017, 6, 10.
Andrew E.G, et al. Diagnosis and management of acute cholecystitis: a single-centre audit of guideline adherence and patient outcomes, Can J Surg,J can chir, 2020, 63(3) E241~249.
Manabu S et al. Risk Factors of Postoperative Complications in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis, jsls, 2020, 24(4), 00049.
Yokose M et al. descriptive review of acute cholecystitis: Japan-Taiwan collaborative epidemiological study, J hepatobiliary pancreat sci, 2017, 24(6), 319~328.
Matthew H et al. Validation of the AAST EGS acute cholecystitis grade and comparison with the Tokyo guidelines, Surgery, 2017, 6, 10.
Additional Files
Published
Issue
Section
License
Declaration and Copyright Transfer Form
(to be completed by authors)
I/ We, the undersigned author(s) of the submitted manuscript, hereby declare, that the above manuscript which is submitted for publication in the STM Journals(s), is not published already in part or whole (except in the form of abstract) in any journal or magazine for private or public circulation, and, is not under consideration of publication elsewhere.
- I/We will not withdraw the manuscript after 1 week of submission as I have read the Author Guidelines and will adhere to the guidelines.
- I/We Author(s ) have neither given nor will give this manuscript elsewhere for publishing after submitting in STM Journal(s).
- I/ We have read the original version of the manuscript and am/ are responsible for the thought contents embodied in it. The work dealt in the manuscript is my/ our own, and my/ our individual contribution to this work is significant enough to qualify for authorship.
- I/We also agree to the authorship of the article in the following order:
Author’s name
1. ________________
2. ________________
3. ________________
4. ________________
| We Author(s) tick this box and would request you to consider it as our signature as we agree to the terms of this Copyright Notice, which will apply to this submission if and when it is published by this journal. |