3D Evaluation of Various Rotary Instruments for the Removal of Gutta-Percha and Resilon from Root Canals
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37591/rrjod.v14i2.3244Keywords:
Gutta-percha, Resilon, ProTaper retreatment files, Mtwo retreatment files.Abstract
Aims: To assess the effectiveness of Protaper and Mtwo retreatment files in the elimination of gutta-percha and Resilon from uncomplicated root canals
Methods and Material: Thirty six freshly extracted single rooted teeth with Weine’s class I canal configuration were taken. The crowns were de-crowned to a depth of 16mm, and the working length was determined to be 15mm. Root canal preparation was done using rotary Protaper universal files and irrigated with 1 ml of 3% sodium hypochlorite. Samples were divided into four groups of nine specimens each with regards to filling material and instruments used for removing filling material as follows:-
Group A: Gutta-percha/Protaper;
Group B: Resilon/Protaper;
Group C: Gutta-percha/Mtwo;
Group D: Resilon/Mtwo.
In groups A & C root canals were obturated with gutta- percha using zinc oxide eugenol as sealer and in groups B & D Resilon points were used with Real seal dual curable resin sealer using cold lateral condensation technique. Samples were stored at 37 ºC for two weeks and then removal of root filling material was carried out using specified instruments. Samples were assessed through cone beam computed tomography for canal area and residual filling material.
Statistical analysis used: Statistical analysis was conducted through the utilization of one-way ANOVA followed by post hoc tests.
Results: No individual system achieved total elimination of the root filling material from the inner walls of the root canal. ProTaper retreatment files demonstrated greater efficacy in gutta-percha removal compared to Mtwo retreatment files, with no statistically significant difference observed in comparison to Resilon (P>0.05).
Conclusions: Gutta-percha was removed significantly better from the canal walls than Resilon by the ProTaper retreatment files as compared to Mtwo retreatment files.
References
Siqueira JF. Aetiology of root canal treatment failure: why well-treated teeth can fail. Int Endontic J 2001;34:1–10.
Masiero AV, Barletta FB. Effectiveness of different techniques for removing gutta-percha during retreatment. Int Endontic J 2005;38:2–7.
Hammad M, Qualtrough A, Silikas N. Three-dimensional evaluation of effectiveness of hand and rotary instrumentation for retreatment of canals filled with different materials. J Endod 2008;34:1370–3.
Wilcox LR. Endodontic retreatment: ultrasonics and chloroform as the final step in reinstrumentation. J Endod 1989;15:125–8.
Viducic D, Jukic S, Karlovic Z, Bozic Z, Miletic I, Anic I. Removal of gutta-percha from root canals using an Nd:YAG laser. Int Endontic J 2003;36:670–3.
de Oliveira DP, Barbizam JV, Trope M, Teixeira FB. Comparison between gutta-percha and resilon removal using two different techniques in endodontic retreatment. J Endod 2006;32:362–4.
Somma F, Cammarota G, Plotino G, Grande NM, Pameijer CH. The effectiveness of manual and mechanical instrumentation for the retreatment of three different root canal filling materials. J Endod 2008;34:466–9.
Tasdemir T, Yildirim T, Celik D. Comparative study of removal of current endodontic fillings. J Endod 2008b;34:326–9.
Gergi R, Sabbagh C. Effectiveness of two nickel-titanium rotary instruments and a hand file for removing gutta-percha in severely curved root canals during retreatment: an ex vivo study. Int Endontic J 2007;40:532–7.
Cunha RS, De Martin AS, Barros PP, da Silva FM, de Castilho Jacinto R, da Silveira Bueno CE. In Vitro Evaluation of the Cleansing Working Time and Analysis of the Amount of Gutta-Percha or Resilon Remnants in the Root Canal Walls after Instrumentation for Endodontic Retreatment. J Endod 2007;33:1426 –1428.
Schirrmeister JF, Wrbas KT, Meyer KM, Altenburger MJ, Hellwig E. Efficacy of different rotary instruments for gutta-percha removal in root canal retreatment. J Endod 2006;32:469–72.
Mittal N, Jain J. Spiral computed tomography assessment of the efficacy of different rotary versus hand retreatment system. J Conserv Dent 2014;17:8-12.
Marfisi K, Mercade M, Plotino G, Duran-Sindreu F, Bueno R, Roig M. Efficacy of three different rotary files to remove gutta-percha and Resilon from root canals. Int Endontic J 2010;43:1022–1028.
Hassanloo A, Watson P, Finer Y, Friedman S. Retreatment efficacy of the Epiphany soft resin obturation system. Int Endontic J 2007;40:633–43.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Declaration and Copyright Transfer Form
(to be completed by authors)
I/ We, the undersigned author(s) of the submitted manuscript, hereby declare, that the above manuscript which is submitted for publication in the STM Journals(s), is not published already in part or whole (except in the form of abstract) in any journal or magazine for private or public circulation, and, is not under consideration of publication elsewhere.
- I/We will not withdraw the manuscript after 1 week of submission as I have read the Author Guidelines and will adhere to the guidelines.
- I/We Author(s ) have niether given nor will give this manuscript elsewhere for publishing after submitting in STM Journal(s).
- I/ We have read the original version of the manuscript and am/ are responsible for the thought contents embodied in it. The work dealt in the manuscript is my/ our own, and my/ our individual contribution to this work is significant enough to qualify for authorship.
- I/We also agree to the authorship of the article in the following order:
Author’s name
1. ________________
2. ________________
3. ________________
4. ________________
| We Author(s) tick this box and would request you to consider it as our signature as we agree to the terms of this Copyright Notice, which will apply to this submission if and when it is published by this journal. |