Clinical Utility of Electroglottography and Videostroboscopy: A Correlational Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37591/rrjohp.v9i3.1364Abstract
Voice serves as a unique identity of an individual which is derived from laryngeal features. Any deviance in the voice quality is considered abnormal and thus seeks clinical attention. Speech-Language Pathologist (SLP) plays an important role in the assessment and diagnosis of voice-related disorders. Although perceptual evaluation is a gold standard, objective methods augment the accuracy of the diagnosis of voice disorders. Electroglottography (EGG) is one such commonly used non-invasive objective method which provides physiological information about vocal fold movements. Videostroboscopy is an objective method which aids SLPs to visualize the structure and function of the larynx during phonation; however, it is not easily available to SLPs. Various voice disorders yield varied and distinct structural and physiological mechanism which leads to a specific type of morphology of EGG waveform. However, a valid correlation between EGG waveforms and videostroboscopy findings would facilitate speech-language pathologists in the diagnosis of voice disorders. With evidence from videostroboscopy of various vocal pathologies, this study attempts to correlate the EGG findings.
Keywords: Electroglottography (EGG), videostroboscopy, vocal pathologies, Xion EndoStrobe Videostroboscopy system, Stroboscopy
Cite this Article
Sreedevi N, Nikitha M, Nivanka R, Niharika M.K. Clinical Utility of Electroglottography and Videostroboscopy: A Correlational Study. Research & Reviews: A Journal of Health Professions. 2019; 9(3): 1–10p.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Declaration and Copyright Transfer Form
(to be completed by authors)
I/ We, the undersigned author(s) of the submitted manuscript, hereby declare, that the above manuscript which is submitted for publication in the STM Journals(s), is not published already in part or whole (except in the form of abstract) in any journal or magazine for private or public circulation, and, is not under consideration of publication elsewhere.
- I/We will not withdraw the manuscript after 1 week of submission as I have read the Author Guidelines and will adhere to the guidelines.
- I/We Author(s ) have niether given nor will give this manuscript elsewhere for publishing after submitting in STM Journal(s).
- I/ We have read the original version of the manuscript and am/ are responsible for the thought contents embodied in it. The work dealt in the manuscript is my/ our own, and my/ our individual contribution to this work is significant enough to qualify for authorship.
- I/We also agree to the authorship of the article in the following order:
Author’s name
1. ________________
2. ________________
3. ________________
4. ________________
| We Author(s) tick this box and would request you to consider it as our signature as we agree to the terms of this Copyright Notice, which will apply to this submission if and when it is published by this journal. |