Utility of Masked Priming Paradigm in Treatment of Anomic Aphasia: An Exploratory Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37591/rrjon.v8i3.529Abstract
The study was carried out with the aim of testing the utility of masked priming paradigm in persons with anomic aphasia. The study was carried in two phases, in the training phase line drawings were used, the participants were asked to observe the prime and focus on the target. Nouns were used as target; the nouns were preceded by primes which were either semantically related or unrelated to the target. Half of the target items were preceded by a masked prime (presented for 500 milliseconds) and the remaining stimulus was preceded by a conventional prime (presented for 1500 milliseconds). The outcome was measured in terms of reaction time and accuracy. The reaction time and accuracy were better for masked prime compared to conventional primes in the training phase suggesting the efficacy of the masked priming on retrieval.
Keywords: Automatic mechanism, volitional mechanism, aphasia
Cite this Article
Abhishek B.P. Utility of Masked Priming Paradigm in Treatment of Anomic Aphasia: An Exploratory Study. Research and Reviews: Journal of Neuroscience. 2018; 8(3): 30–33p.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Declaration and Copyright Transfer Form
(to be completed by authors)
I/ We, the undersigned author(s) of the submitted manuscript, hereby declare, that the above manuscript which is submitted for publication in the STM Journals(s), is not published already in part or whole (except in the form of abstract) in any journal or magazine for private or public circulation, and, is not under consideration of publication elsewhere.
- I/We will not withdraw the manuscript after 1 week of submission as I have read the Author Guidelines and will adhere to the guidelines.
- I/We Author(s ) have niether given nor will give this manuscript elsewhere for publishing after submitting in STM Journal(s).
- I/ We have read the original version of the manuscript and am/ are responsible for the thought contents embodied in it. The work dealt in the manuscript is my/ our own, and my/ our individual contribution to this work is significant enough to qualify for authorship.
- I/We also agree to the authorship of the article in the following order:
Author’s name
1. ________________
2. ________________
3. ________________
4. ________________
| We Author(s) tick this box and would request you to consider it as our signature as we agree to the terms of this Copyright Notice, which will apply to this submission if and when it is published by this journal. |