The Patient’s Dilemma: An approach in Medical Decision Making using the Prisoner’s Dilemma Model and the Prospect Theory
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37591/rrjom.v8i3.556Keywords:
Medical Decision Making, Patient’s Dilemma, Prisoner’s Dilemma, Prospect TheoryAbstract
Prospect theory suggests that when people are faced with uncertain outcome, they may be risk seeking or aversive, depending on the utility value. While Prisoner’s dilemma shows that suboptimal choices are made if people seek their own gain only. Patients’ demand in decision making during the recent years evolved this dilemma. Through a mathematical approach and survey, the doctor-patient involvement in decision making has been explored. A hypothetical model was created simulating the Prisoner’s dilemma to show patient would make sub-optimal choices. In a comparative study that considered Prospect Theory, 50 doctors and 50 non-doctors were asked to answer questions that involved their decision making. The patient’s dilemma arises when choosing between two doctors who have similar cure rates. The decisions of non-doctors were similar to doctors in most of the questions. The difference arose, when comparing two hypothetical doctors, one of whom had a slight better cure rate but had less experience; significantly more doctors (66%) chose the experienced (but with less success rate) doctor for their own treatment, than non-doctors (42%). The chi-square statistic being 4.6517 with p-value .031024, result was significant at p<.05. We can conclude, optimal decision cannot be obtained if either of the participant’s decision is ignored. Doctors use heuristics, while patients (non-doctors) can be more rational in their approach. So, decision making should be shared.
Keywords: Medical decision making, patient’s dilemma, prisoner’s dilemma, prospect theory
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Declaration and Copyright Transfer Form
(to be completed by authors)
I/ We, the undersigned author(s) of the submitted manuscript, hereby declare, that the above manuscript which is submitted for publication in the STM Journals(s), is not published already in part or whole (except in the form of abstract) in any journal or magazine for private or public circulation, and, is not under consideration of publication elsewhere.
- I/We will not withdraw the manuscript after 1 week of submission as I have read the Author Guidelines and will adhere to the guidelines.
- I/We Author(s ) have niether given nor will give this manuscript elsewhere for publishing after submitting in STM Journal(s).
- I/ We have read the original version of the manuscript and am/ are responsible for the thought contents embodied in it. The work dealt in the manuscript is my/ our own, and my/ our individual contribution to this work is significant enough to qualify for authorship.
- I/We also agree to the authorship of the article in the following order:
Author’s name
1. ________________
2. ________________
3. ________________
4. ________________
| We Author(s) tick this box and would request you to consider it as our signature as we agree to the terms of this Copyright Notice, which will apply to this submission if and when it is published by this journal. |